Everybody's favorite right-wing, insanity-purveying, hate-spouting, terrorism-fomenting harpy Ann Coulter's response to being labeled a plagiarist?
Why, none other than to go on the attack. Writing in her latest column, she goes after the NY Post, which exposed her plagiarism.
(Ann Coulter on a crusade against the New York Post? Let me take time out just to say the following:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Thank you.)
She writes: "Once considered a legitimate daily, the Post has been reduced to tabloid status best known for Page Six's breathless accounts of Paris Hilton's latest ruttings, and headlines like 'Vampire Teen -- H.S. Girl Is Out for Blood.' How crappy a newspaper is the Post? Let me put it this way: It's New York's second-crappiest paper."
Aside from the rich ironies involved in Ann Coulter schooling anyone in journalism, I have just one quick observation, Ann -- how do you reduce the Post to "tabloid status"...when it already is a tabloid?
Also, as Justin Rood noted at TPMMuckraker, "Careful readers will note that within the venom, a denial is nowhere to be found."
I guess it's all just a lying liberal left-wing conspiracy, right, Ann? Care to address the discrepancies?
Coulter goes on to fume: "This week I plan to reveal my own top secret information: an interview I did with the New York Post the week my current No. 1 best seller, "Godless," was released. On account of an important breaking story on Angelina Jolie's new tattoo, the Post never found room to run the long interview I wasted my time answering for the Post's Larry Getlen."
So...if you hate the Post so much, Ann, then why did you sit for a "long interview" with them?
After all, even Paris Hilton probably believes she's in love. There's a different word for what Ann Coulter's doing.