I was curious about the Howard Dean rally Tuesday night in Bryant Park, so I walked by to check it out. As I was heading into the park, volunteers were herding people into two lines: one for people who had "pre-registered", and one for people who hadn't. If you didn't register for the rally, either on the spot or in advance, they didn't let you into the park.
I'd gotten numerous e-mails from the Dean campaign urging me to register for the rally, but I didn't realize that it was compulsory. I'll admit to not reading the fine print here, but I figured that they were asking folks to RSVP ahead of time so they'd have an idea of the expected turnout, and to get people to commit to attending.
I didn't want to register, for various reasons (privacy, general lack of enthusiasm for registering anywhere, the fact that my media-organization employer doesn't like its employees to publicly support political candidates, being tired from a long day at work and not relishing the thought of standing in a long line), so I decided to skip the rally and thus headed home. I have some unanswered questions, however:
--There's a longstanding tradition of anonymity in American democracy, most notably in the rules guaranteeing a secret ballot. Is Dean not in favor of this? (Yes, I'm aware that I'm making an absurd argument here, and that attendance at a rally is not the same as voting. It still strikes me as hinky, though.)
--The campaign already knows that I'm a supporter; I gave them my e-mail address. I'm in their database already -- why do I need to sign up somewhere ELSE? I asked a couple different volunteers about this, and no one had an answer.
--Bryant Park is a public park, as far as I know. Could the Dean campaign limit access to it?
I'm not exactly out to pull a Gilmore over this. But having to give my name (even a fake one) in order to attend a public political event -- for a candidate that I'm not sure I'm even going to vote for -- seems odd, and certainly contrary to the grassroots spirit of the Dean campaign.