There was scandalously little coverage this week on the accession of Gordon Brown to the UK Premiership. The United Kingdom is arguably America's most important ally, and political power there is concentrated in the person of the Prime Minister -- to a much greater extent, even, than the President of the United States wields.
Anyway, I was trolling through the British media, and I discovered something interesting that I'd never heard before. This is, I'm sure, old hat to the better-informed of my fellow Angophiles (not to mention any actual British readers I may have), but did you know that a Member of the British House of Commons cannot resign? MPs are apparently legally prohibited from doing so, under a 17th-century law. Quoting from Wikipedia:
In 1623 a rule was declared that said that members of Parliament were given a
trust to represent their constituencies, and therefore were not at
liberty to resign them. In those days, Parliament was weaker, and
service was sometimes considered a resented duty rather than a position
of power and honour.
But, of course, MPs can and do resign, for all sorts of reasons. Take the current shuffle, for example: it was easy for Tony Blair to step down as Prime Minister; all he had to do was relinquish the leadership of the Labour Party; Parliament was not dissolved, no general election was called, and Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown took over the party leadership and thus the Premiership. However, this still would leave Blair as a Member of Parliament; he has represented the constituency of Sedgefield since 1983 (somewhat nominally, I suspect, during his service as Prime Minister from 1997 on) and would still be their MP. He had his next job lined up -- that of Middle East envoy for the Quartet -- but needed a way out of the Commons.
So they came up with a clever workaround: one cannot resign from the House of Commons, but one can be disqualified from membership therein. One way to be disqualified is to accept an "office of profit under the Crown", because of course it would create a conflict of interest for an MP to act independently and still be in the pay of the King or Queen.
Enter the Steward of the Chiltern Hundreds and the Steward of the Manor of Northstead. These impressive-sounding posts, once real enough, are pure sinecures now : no duties are expected. If an MP want out of Parliament, s/he simply applies formally for one of these posts, the Chancellor appoints him or her to the post, and they are therefore disqualified from service in the House of Commons.
Neat. (And somehow, very British.)
And this is why Gordon Brown's last official act as Chancellor was this arcane bit of parliamentary procedure:
The Chancellor of the Exchequer has this day appointed the Right
Honourable Anthony Charles Lynton Blair to be Steward and Bailiff of
the Three Hundreds of Chiltern.